ObjectiveTo summarize the current status and progress of nutritional support therapy for pancreatic cancer in order to improve the understanding of the impact of nutritional support treatment on pancreatic cancer and guide clinical work.MethodThe literatures about nutritional support and chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer at home and abroad were read and reviewed.ResultsFor most patients with malignant pancreatic tumors, nutritional risk or malnutrition might accompany them for a lifetime. Regular nutritional risk screening, timely nutritional assessment and necessary nutritional treatment played an extremely important role in the process of comprehensive anti-tumor treatment.ConclusionAlthough there are still some core problems to be solved in nutritional support therapy and chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer, its efficacy is gradually recognized and widely used by clinical workers, which might be helpful to improve the prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the potential value of C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) as an indicator of prognosis and survival in patients with pancreatic cancer. MethodsThe literatures were searched comprehensively in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CBM, Wanfang, CNKI, and CQVIP databases from the establishment of the databases to May 20, 2021. The combined hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were used to evaluate the correlation between the CAR and the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), or disease-free survival (DFS) in the patients with pancreatic cancer. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of the non-randomized controlled studies, and the Stata SE 15.0 software was used for meta-analysis. ResultsA total of 2 985 patients with pancreatic cancer were included in this meta-analysis of 15 studies. The results of meta-analysis showed that the higher CAR value, the shorter OS [effect size (ES)=0.60, 95%CI (0.50, 0.69), Z=12.04, P<0.001], DFS [ES=0.63, 95%CI (0.47, 0.78), Z=3.61, P<0.001], and PFS [ES=0.41, 95%CI (0.19, 0.63), Z=7.91, P<0.001] in the patients with pancreatic cancer. The results of subgroup analysis of OS according to different countries, sample size, mean age, follow-up time, CAR cut-off value, and NOS score showed that the higher CAR value was related to the shorter OS (P<0.05). The result of linear regression analysis showed that there was no correlation between the CAR cut-off value and lnHR of OS (r2=0.947, P=0.455). Conclusion From results of this study, CAR is closely related to OS of patients, and it is expected to be used as a new reference index for monitoring and judging prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer.
ObjectiveTo explore the prognostic factors of malignant tumors in ampulla, lower bile duct, head of pancreas, uncinate process, and neck of pancreas after operation.MethodThe recent literatures on malignant tumors in this region at home and abroad were summarized.ResultsThe prognosis of five groups of malignant tumors in ampulla, lower bile duct, head of pancreas, uncinate process, and neck of pancreas was correlated with their origin, growth site, tumor diameter, nerve invasion, vascular invasion, lymphatic metastasis, pathological and histological classification, and cutting edge status. The different location and pathological classification of tumors made the different neurovascular invasion rate, lymphatic metastasis rate, and R0 resection rate.ConclusionsBy summarizing and analyzing the origin, growth site, diameter, nerve invasion, vascular invasion, lymphatic metastasis, pathological and histological classification, and cutting edge status of tumors, we can improve the clinical prediction of tumors in this region, select appropriate surgical methods before operation, and formulate more reasonable adjuvant treatment plan after operation, in order to improve the pertinence of the treatment of tumors in this region, improve the prediction, and finally better serve the clinical work.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the predictive value of the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) for postoperative overall and severe complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in the elderly patients with pancreatic cancer. MethodsThe clinical data of the elderly (65 years old or more) patients with pancreatic cancer underwent PD were retrospectively collected, who were admitted to the Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January 2017 to October 2021. The incidences of postoperative overall and severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅲ–Ⅴ was defined as severe complications) were summarized. The univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze whether GNRI was a risk factor for overall and severe complications after PD. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the ability of GNRI to distinguish whether overall or severe complications occurred after PD and to confirm the optimal threshold. Then the patients were assigned into a high nutritional risk group (greater than the optimal threshold) and low nutritional risk group (the optimal threshold or less) based on this. Simultaneously, the clinical outcomes of the two groups were compared. ResultsIn this study, 190 elderly patients with pancreatic cancer were enrolled, 95(50.0%) of whom developed complications, including 28(29.5%) cases of serious complications. The results of multivariate logistic regression model analysis showed that the decreased GNRI was a risk factor for the occurrence of overall and severe complications after PD for the elderly patients [OR(95%CI)=0.195(0.065, 0.592), P=0.004; OR(95%CI)=0.890(0.823, 0.906), P=0.003]. The AUC of GNRI for assessing the occurrence of overall and severe complications was 0.765 and 0.715, respectively, with the optimal critical values of 98 and 96, respectively. Compared with the low nutritional risk group, the high nutritional risk group had higher postoperative total hospitalization costs (Z=–2.49, P=0.013), higher occurrences of overall complications (χ2=44.609, P<0.001) and severe complications (χ2=7.889, P=0.005), and higher occurrences of pancreatic fistula and gastric emptying disorders (χ2=17.682, P<0.001; χ2=4.975, P=0.026). ConclusionsIn elderly patients with pancreatic cancer underwent PD, incidence of serious complications is not lower. GNRI has a good discriminative value in terms of postoperative overall and severe complications. When preoperative GNRI is 98 or less and GNRI is 96 or less, patients should be given early preoperative nutritional support treatment in time.
Objective To summarize the experience of single center for radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) in the treatment of pancreatic body and tail cancer. Methods The clinical data of 52 patients with pancreatic body and tail cancer who underwent RAMPS surgery in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January 2013 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Results All operations of the 52 patients were successfully completed, with no death during hospitalization and 30 days after surgery. The operative time was (463±137) min (198–830 min), the median of intraoperative blood loss was 400 mL (100–2 800 mL), of which 19 cases (36.5%) received intraoperative blood transfusion. The median of hospital stay was 19.5 days (7–58 days). After operation, 18 patients suffered from pancreatic fistula, 5 patients suffered from delay gastric emptying, 7 patients suffered from peritoneal effusion, 3 patients suffered from pleural effusion, 4 patients suffered from abdominal infection, 2 patients suffered from abdominal bleeding. Reoperations were performed in 2 patients. There were 51 patients were followed up for 3–35 months (the median of 18 months) with the median survival time were 16.2 months. During the follow-up period, 21 patients suffered from recurrence or metastasis, of which 8 patients died. The results of Cox partial hazard model showed that, surgical margin ［RR=3.65, 95% CI was (0.06, 5.11), P=0.026］ and adjuvant therapy ［RR=6.43, 95% CI was (1.51, 27.43), P=0.012］ were statistically related with prognosis, the prognosis of patients with negative surgical margin and underwent adjuvant therapy were better than those patients with positive surgical margin and didn’t underwent adjuvant therapy. Conclusions RAMPS is safe and feasible in the treatment of pancreatic body and tail cancer, and it may improve the R0 resection rate. RAMPS combins with adjuvant therapy can contribute to better prognosis.