• 1. Center for Evidence-based Medicine, School of Basic Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;
  • 2. School of Nursing, Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;
  • 3. The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;
  • 4. Evidence-based Medicine Center, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, P. R. China;
TIAN Jinhui, Email: tjh996@163.com; ZHANG Junhua, Email: zjhtcm@foxmail.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) serve as the cornerstone of medical decision-making, with evaluation tools such as AGREE and RIGHT designed to ensure that these guidelines are grounded in the best available evidence and contribute to enhancing healthcare quality. This article reviews the historical development and current status of CPG evaluation tools, examining their diversity, complexity, application challenges, and inconsistencies in evaluation outcomes. A thorough discussion is provided on the strengths and weaknesses of existing evaluation tools, along with proposed future developmental directions. It is recommended that future efforts prioritize the creation of more streamlined tool designs, foster enhanced international collaboration strategies, and incorporate artificial intelligence technologies. These initiatives aim to improve both the efficiency and accuracy of evaluative processes while facilitating advancements in healthcare practices towards elevated quality standards.

Copyright © the editorial department of Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine of West China Medical Publisher. All rights reserved