• 1. The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Clinical Skills Training Center, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;
  • 2. Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;
  • 3. School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, P. R. China;
  • 4. The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of CM, Zhengzhou 450000, P. R. China;
  • 5. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;
  • 6. Central Laboratory, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610075, P. R. China;
  • 7. Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, P. R. China;
WANG Zhida, Email: m13609305077@163.com; LU Cuncun, Email: lu17metrics@163.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Surrogate endpoints, defined as biomarkers or intermediate outcomes utilized in clinical trials to replace the ultimate targeted outcomes, have witnessed a growing prevalence in both clinical trials and drug-device approvals in recent years. To standardize the application and reporting of surrogate endpoints in clinical trial protocols and associated studies, relevant scholars published the SPIRIT-Surrogate and CONSORT-Surrogate reporting guidelines in the BMJ in July 2024. This article provides an interpretation of these guidelines in conjunction with published case studies, with the aim of offering references for domestic researchers, elevating the overall quality of related clinical trials, and eventually facilitating the enhancement of domestic healthcare level.

Copyright © the editorial department of Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine of West China Medical Publisher. All rights reserved